331. Matchmaker Mindset: How to Make Yourself Memorable in Any Conversation
“Boredom is just the enemy of conversation.”
Small talk doesn’t have to be boring. For matchmaker and dating coach Rachel Greenwald, better conversations start with a little preparation and a willingness to move beyond predictable questions toward the stories that make people memorable. In this episode of Think Fast, Talk Smart, Greenwald joins Matt Abrahams to share strategies for building stronger connections in dating, networking, and the workplace. From bridging small talk toward more meaningful topics to navigating taboo subjects and showing more vulnerability, she explains how to create conversations that bring out the best in others and ourselves.
Takeaways:
- Better small talk starts with a little strategy. Preparing a few topics and finding natural bridges toward what makes you unique can turn routine exchanges into more memorable, meaningful interactions.
- Connection comes from stories, not just information. Asking questions that invite people to share experiences and emotions can reveal more than factual answers and help deepen relationships.
Activity:
- Build a better bridge. Turn three standard small-talk questions into openings that lead somewhere more interesting. For example, instead of answering “How are you?” with “Good,” practice a response that naturally introduces a story, interest, or experience someone could ask you about.
Printable Expanded Takeaways & Activities
To listen to the extended Deep Thinks version of this episode, please visit FasterSmarter.io/premium.
Episode Reference Links:
Connect:
- Premium Signup >>>> Think Fast Talk Smart Premium
- Email Questions & Feedback >>> hello@fastersmarter.io
- Episode Transcripts >>> Think Fast Talk Smart Website
- Newsletter Signup + English Language Learning >>> FasterSmarter.io
- Think Fast Talk Smart >>> LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube
- Matt Abrahams >>> LinkedIn
- (00:00) - Introduction
- (00:50) - Strategic Small Talk
- (04:27) - Building Your Personal Brand
- (08:21) - Mastering the First 60 Seconds
- (10:54) - Starting in the Middle
- (12:17) - Navigating Taboo Topics
- (15:36) - The Final Three Questions
- (23:33) - Conclusion
********
Thank you to our sponsors. These partnerships support the ongoing production of the podcast, allowing us to bring it to you at no cost.
Unleash your Superhuman potential with AI that meets you where you work. Learn more at superhuman.com
Join our Think Fast Talk Smart Learning Community and become the communicator you want to be.
00:00:02.904 --> 00:00:07.848
Conversations can be brutal, but with
a little preparation and bridging,
00:00:07.889 --> 00:00:09.972
you can have amazing communication.
00:00:10.554 --> 00:00:13.532
My name's Matt Abrahams, and I
teach Strategic Communication at
00:00:13.533 --> 00:00:15.309
Stanford Graduate School of Business.
00:00:15.537 --> 00:00:18.675
Welcome to Think Fast,
Talk Smart, the podcast.
00:00:19.414 --> 00:00:21.401
Today, I'm excited to have
another conversation with
00:00:21.402 --> 00:00:22.759
my friend Rachel Greenwald.
00:00:22.872 --> 00:00:26.002
Rachel is an executive fellow at Harvard
Business School and a professional
00:00:26.006 --> 00:00:27.537
matchmaker and dating coach.
00:00:27.924 --> 00:00:31.744
Rachel is an expert on communication and
relationship building, not only in the
00:00:31.744 --> 00:00:34.027
dating arena, but also in the workplace.
00:00:34.394 --> 00:00:38.019
She's here on campus at Stanford to
co-teach a class with Professor Tina
00:00:38.020 --> 00:00:40.187
Seelig called Designing for Love.
00:00:40.668 --> 00:00:41.553
Welcome, Rachel.
00:00:41.577 --> 00:00:45.368
I am so glad you decided to revisit us,
and it's great to be in person this time.
00:00:45.371 --> 00:00:46.178
Thanks for being here.
00:00:46.293 --> 00:00:46.928
You're welcome.
00:00:46.933 --> 00:00:48.147
Thanks for having me back.
00:00:48.166 --> 00:00:48.800
Excellent.
00:00:48.800 --> 00:00:49.654
Shall we get started?
00:00:49.739 --> 00:00:50.266
Let's do it.
00:00:50.312 --> 00:00:51.016
All right.
00:00:51.299 --> 00:00:55.857
The last time you were here, we talked a
lot about small talk, and you gave very
00:00:55.942 --> 00:01:01.945
actionable, useful advice that I use to
this day to start and to exit small talk.
00:01:01.953 --> 00:01:06.892
The white flag approach you taught was
amazing, and I really quote you often
00:01:06.892 --> 00:01:11.311
with the point that small talk is about
being interested and not interesting.
00:01:11.547 --> 00:01:14.069
And if any of you want to
hear Rachel's advice on small
00:01:14.069 --> 00:01:16.317
talk, go back to episode 217.
00:01:16.973 --> 00:01:22.437
So if those were sort of the entry-level,
beginner-level small talk advice and
00:01:22.437 --> 00:01:27.649
tips, can you give us some advanced
advice, black belt level small talk
00:01:27.719 --> 00:01:32.750
tips to help us better communicate and
help us avoid that dread we all feel?
00:01:33.246 --> 00:01:38.360
Yeah, everybody hates small talk because
mostly it's so boring and awkward.
00:01:38.433 --> 00:01:43.294
So I think that moving up the
scale to graduate level small
00:01:43.295 --> 00:01:47.615
talk advice is really about moving
from playing defense to offense.
00:01:48.139 --> 00:01:52.199
So defense is more like coming
up with good answers to basic
00:01:52.199 --> 00:01:54.695
small talk questions, which
we talked about last time.
00:01:55.067 --> 00:01:59.976
But playing offense is more about
being strategic with your small talk
00:01:59.988 --> 00:02:05.387
game to help your conversation partner
learn something about you that might
00:02:05.463 --> 00:02:08.725
lead to a desired goal that you have.
00:02:09.041 --> 00:02:14.451
So this is really where your personal
brand comes in, where I want you to find
00:02:14.463 --> 00:02:20.513
a bridge out of the initial stages of
small talk that leads towards a topic
00:02:20.696 --> 00:02:23.606
that makes you unique and memorable.
00:02:24.146 --> 00:02:25.516
So here's an example.
00:02:25.791 --> 00:02:29.000
Maybe you're on a date or
you're in a job interview.
00:02:29.332 --> 00:02:34.409
You want it to go well, so you think a
little bit ahead of time, "What is it
00:02:34.409 --> 00:02:39.192
that makes me unique from all the other
dates that he's been on this week or all
00:02:39.194 --> 00:02:44.392
the other candidates he's interviewed
this week?" And in your case, Matt, maybe
00:02:44.420 --> 00:02:47.461
it's that being a podcast host is unique.
00:02:47.462 --> 00:02:49.808
You know, you don't meet
those hosts every day.
00:02:50.115 --> 00:02:54.952
What I want you to do is find a bridge
that is gonna take you from a basic
00:02:54.953 --> 00:02:59.836
small talk question like, "How are
you?" to something that allows you
00:02:59.836 --> 00:03:02.168
to talk about being a podcast host.
00:03:02.452 --> 00:03:06.769
So for example, if I say, "How
are you?" You might say, "Oh,
00:03:06.802 --> 00:03:08.963
I'm actually doing great today.
00:03:09.018 --> 00:03:13.587
I just interviewed a really
interesting guest on my podcast, and
00:03:13.591 --> 00:03:18.380
she told me all about organic wine."
And so now you've sort of bridged
00:03:18.392 --> 00:03:20.155
into this more interesting topic.
00:03:20.425 --> 00:03:24.689
The key, though, is that you have
to have a plan going into these
00:03:24.690 --> 00:03:28.161
type of conversations because you
can't expect to just come up with
00:03:28.163 --> 00:03:29.697
something like that on the spot.
00:03:30.079 --> 00:03:33.753
Think about if you're an athlete,
you wouldn't just start exercising.
00:03:33.834 --> 00:03:37.489
You would do some stretching and
warming up before the exercise.
00:03:37.886 --> 00:03:42.161
So all sorts of examples like this, for
example, in a job interview, let's say
00:03:42.233 --> 00:03:47.745
one of the personal brand attributes that
makes you unique is that you're gritty.
00:03:47.765 --> 00:03:49.245
You, you have a lot of grit.
00:03:49.642 --> 00:03:54.564
Maybe you walk into a job
interviewer's office, and he's
00:03:54.581 --> 00:04:00.555
got a photo of himself climbing a
mountain behind him on the desk.
00:04:00.850 --> 00:04:05.766
And so you could do this bridge where
you say, "Oh, I noticed that hiking
00:04:05.767 --> 00:04:11.430
photo over there. I'm curious where that
hike is because actually I just climbed
00:04:11.444 --> 00:04:18.231
Kilimanjaro this year, and it was so hard,
but I did it." And so here you're moving
00:04:18.235 --> 00:04:24.492
basic small talk into something that is
strategic on your part, demonstrating your
00:04:24.492 --> 00:04:27.257
personal brand, that is grit in this case.
00:04:27.703 --> 00:04:30.048
So what I really hear is it's
about branding and bridging
00:04:30.408 --> 00:04:31.898
and how you connect those two.
00:04:31.898 --> 00:04:34.621
And what's required there is
to be a little strategic and to
00:04:34.629 --> 00:04:38.291
think in advance about what are
those things that make me unique.
00:04:38.688 --> 00:04:42.289
What advice do you have as we
reflect on our personal brand?
00:04:42.289 --> 00:04:44.706
We've had Seth Godin and Dorie
Clark on the show, and they've
00:04:44.711 --> 00:04:45.991
talked about personal brand as well.
00:04:45.992 --> 00:04:50.303
But as a matchmaker, I'm wondering if
you have a specific way of thinking about
00:04:50.597 --> 00:04:52.291
brand that we could all benefit from.
00:04:52.674 --> 00:04:53.229
I do.
00:04:53.244 --> 00:04:57.542
I mean, I think the first thing to say
about personal branding is that it gets
00:04:57.542 --> 00:05:03.140
a bad reputation as being manipulative
or like you're bragging or showing off
00:05:03.176 --> 00:05:08.260
if you talk about something that makes
you unique or special or memorable.
00:05:08.582 --> 00:05:12.315
So I think the first thing is you have
to get that out of your head, that I
00:05:12.325 --> 00:05:18.098
think the better metaphor about personal
branding is that it's almost like you're
00:05:18.258 --> 00:05:23.793
walking into a restaurant and the hostess
is greeting you at the host stand, and
00:05:23.804 --> 00:05:28.342
she can either make basic small talk with
you and say something like, "How are you?
00:05:28.379 --> 00:05:33.602
Would you like a table?" Or she could
hand you a menu and essentially say,
00:05:33.739 --> 00:05:38.503
"What looks good here tonight on the
menu?" So essentially, she's focusing
00:05:38.572 --> 00:05:43.758
the initial greeting on, like, the
chef's specials and what are the
00:05:43.759 --> 00:05:45.288
signature items at the restaurant.
00:05:45.694 --> 00:05:48.865
Once you've got the right attitude
about personal branding, the, the
00:05:48.866 --> 00:05:54.815
easiest shortcut to what is a personal
brand is to come up with three traits
00:05:54.850 --> 00:05:57.305
or skills that makes you unique.
00:05:57.717 --> 00:06:00.780
Seth Godin talked about this
in Purple Cow, about basically
00:06:00.780 --> 00:06:02.414
how to be unique and memorable.
00:06:02.674 --> 00:06:08.874
And I think you just come up with three
things that feel authentic but also
00:06:08.874 --> 00:06:13.962
unique, kind of the Venn diagram of who
you are, but what's unique about that.
00:06:14.360 --> 00:06:20.215
So maybe you're on a date, for example,
and let's say your three personal brand
00:06:20.284 --> 00:06:25.334
traits are that you're adventurous,
maybe you once appeared on Shark
00:06:25.348 --> 00:06:28.298
Tank, and you're from North Dakota.
00:06:28.709 --> 00:06:31.771
Being from North Dakota is not like
being from New York or California.
00:06:31.772 --> 00:06:32.378
It's unique.
00:06:32.897 --> 00:06:39.926
So you will pick something that is
part of that personal brand and find a
00:06:39.928 --> 00:06:45.496
bridge out of small talk into focusing
on something that makes you memorable.
00:06:45.936 --> 00:06:48.828
Of course, you may not be
the only one on Shark Tank.
00:06:48.828 --> 00:06:50.826
You're not the only one
who's from North Dakota.
00:06:50.826 --> 00:06:52.442
You're not the only one who's adventurous.
00:06:53.015 --> 00:06:59.431
But you might be the Venn diagram of those
three things, and that is a great place to
00:06:59.433 --> 00:07:04.842
start when somebody on a date might say to
you, "What do you do?" You might be able
00:07:04.842 --> 00:07:09.897
to think in advance, uh, well, I'm gonna
talk about being on Shark Tank because
00:07:10.058 --> 00:07:14.075
that's always good fodder for interesting
conversation and the crazy things that
00:07:14.075 --> 00:07:16.397
happened that one time I was on TV.
00:07:16.626 --> 00:07:20.717
And so somebody says, "What do you do?"
And you might start off by saying, "Well,
00:07:20.767 --> 00:07:26.174
I'm an entrepreneur, but I have to tell
you, I've only had 15 minutes of fame.
00:07:26.179 --> 00:07:30.859
My company may not be doing very well
right now, but once I was actually on
00:07:30.862 --> 00:07:35.210
Shark Tank, and I have the craziest
stories about Mr. Wonderful." So
00:07:35.210 --> 00:07:41.275
you brought up the topic, and you've
really served up a interesting menu
00:07:41.311 --> 00:07:45.772
to your conversation partner about
something to talk about right away.
00:07:46.637 --> 00:07:52.849
I really like the idea of delineating your
authentic differences in your brand as
00:07:52.893 --> 00:07:55.082
circles that overlap in a Venn diagram.
00:07:55.313 --> 00:07:57.980
A lot of people say, "Just list out
all the different things," but the
00:07:57.980 --> 00:08:02.396
physical representation and overlaps is
what I think can be really interesting
00:08:02.402 --> 00:08:04.044
because that is what makes you unique.
00:08:04.055 --> 00:08:07.223
There might be a lot of people who have
tenacity and a lot of people who have
00:08:07.223 --> 00:08:10.635
deep knowledge in one area, but that
overlap makes it unique, and I like that
00:08:10.637 --> 00:08:12.560
idea of helping us identify it that way.
00:08:12.933 --> 00:08:18.037
And then thinking of yourself as a host
or a hostess who has to focus that initial
00:08:18.038 --> 00:08:20.063
interaction, I really like that as well.
00:08:20.073 --> 00:08:20.608
Thank you.
00:08:21.073 --> 00:08:25.278
Many of us struggle in conversation
in general, but the real
00:08:25.279 --> 00:08:29.144
struggle is that first beginning
part, that first 60 seconds.
00:08:29.392 --> 00:08:31.930
Do you have advice on how to
maximize and set ourselves up
00:08:31.931 --> 00:08:33.596
to enjoy that beginning part?
00:08:33.596 --> 00:08:35.979
I feel like once I get over that
hump, it becomes much easier.
00:08:36.442 --> 00:08:40.111
You're exactly right, that those
first 60 seconds are the worst.
00:08:40.347 --> 00:08:45.079
I think taking an improv class is
always great because that helps
00:08:45.146 --> 00:08:47.370
teach you to roll with any situation.
00:08:47.380 --> 00:08:51.780
But beyond that, there are two other
things that I coach my dating clients on.
00:08:52.116 --> 00:08:58.727
So the first thing I tell people to
ease that first minute is topic prep.
00:08:59.037 --> 00:09:04.266
So to think about in advance, again,
you're like an athlete stretching
00:09:04.266 --> 00:09:06.401
and warming up for the exercises.
00:09:06.725 --> 00:09:10.255
Topic prep involves just
taking a minute or two before
00:09:10.256 --> 00:09:12.403
you walk into a conversation.
00:09:12.412 --> 00:09:16.286
You're maybe going to a business
networking event or on a date
00:09:16.286 --> 00:09:19.139
or a job interview or even
catching up with a friend.
00:09:19.629 --> 00:09:26.751
And you pause and think of three things
that you're curious to ask in advance.
00:09:27.117 --> 00:09:30.964
So if it's a stranger you're meeting,
you can Google them or find their
00:09:30.982 --> 00:09:35.467
Instagram or look for clues in
some messages you've had so far for
00:09:35.553 --> 00:09:36.858
what they might be interested in.
00:09:37.352 --> 00:09:40.527
But for example, let's say you
looked at their Instagram in advance
00:09:40.529 --> 00:09:44.767
of somebody you're meeting on a
date and you saw that this guy had
00:09:44.805 --> 00:09:46.858
a photo of himself fly fishing.
00:09:47.213 --> 00:09:52.573
So maybe that's one of your three topics
that you've prepped in advance, and you
00:09:52.589 --> 00:09:57.976
are gonna ask how he became interested in
fly fishing, and maybe that's gonna lead
00:09:57.991 --> 00:10:03.858
to a story about how his dad taught him
to fly fish, and it was bonding, and that
00:10:03.880 --> 00:10:06.071
opens up conversation about his family.
00:10:06.217 --> 00:10:08.921
So I think being prepared
is super important.
00:10:09.288 --> 00:10:14.341
There's another really interesting trick
that works especially well in almost
00:10:14.355 --> 00:10:21.973
every situation, and it is a Latin phrase
called in medias res. And in medias res
00:10:21.998 --> 00:10:24.586
means literally in the middle of things.
00:10:25.031 --> 00:10:29.838
So this is where you start
a story in the middle.
00:10:30.111 --> 00:10:34.930
If you've ever seen a TV show where
they start with a robbery in progress,
00:10:35.122 --> 00:10:40.742
and then the show cuts to a phrase
on the screen that says, "Three days
00:10:40.775 --> 00:10:45.786
earlier," and it hooks the listener
to show what led up to that moment.
00:10:46.146 --> 00:10:51.276
In conversation, starting a story in the
middle is something that you actually did
00:10:51.276 --> 00:10:53.221
the last time you and I had a phone call.
00:10:53.241 --> 00:10:54.910
I don't know if you remember this.
00:10:54.910 --> 00:10:55.665
I remember the phone call.
00:10:55.665 --> 00:10:56.640
I don't remember this.
00:10:56.823 --> 00:11:00.803
As soon as we got on the phone, I said
to you something like, "Thanks for
00:11:00.803 --> 00:11:05.322
accommodating my schedule to talk on a
Saturday." And you said, "There I was,
00:11:05.454 --> 00:11:10.305
toilet shopping with my mom when the
reminder for our meeting popped up on my
00:11:10.305 --> 00:11:13.526
phone." And so I was immediately hooked.
00:11:13.608 --> 00:11:15.660
Toilet shopping for your mom?
00:11:15.660 --> 00:11:18.418
What on earth is the backstory to that?
00:11:18.645 --> 00:11:23.180
And you just launched into, in
medias res, in the middle of a story,
00:11:23.221 --> 00:11:29.276
something that was unexpected and
intriguing, and it really just helped
00:11:29.276 --> 00:11:33.461
us get over very quickly those awkward
first 60 seconds of small talk.
00:11:33.954 --> 00:11:35.549
I'm glad I demonstrated that.
00:11:35.751 --> 00:11:39.101
Let's just say it was an explosive
situation that needed to be
00:11:39.101 --> 00:11:40.406
fixed, and we took care of it.
00:11:40.843 --> 00:11:45.101
Again, the advice is to do some
preparation, even though conversations
00:11:45.103 --> 00:11:48.000
are spontaneous, to, to take
the time to do some preparation.
00:11:48.060 --> 00:11:51.901
And that reconnaissance, reflection, and
research on the person or people you're
00:11:51.924 --> 00:11:53.942
interacting with can be really helpful.
00:11:53.942 --> 00:11:58.009
And the goal is not to script out
the communication, but it's really
00:11:58.009 --> 00:12:01.360
to find the opening for further
conversation, is what I heard you say.
00:12:01.362 --> 00:12:04.362
And that, to me, is a very
different way of approaching.
00:12:04.363 --> 00:12:07.371
So it's not just, "What do I say to
start it?" It's, "What do I say to
00:12:07.382 --> 00:12:10.987
open up the conversation?" And I like
the idea of starting in the middle.
00:12:11.185 --> 00:12:14.286
As somebody who teaches people how to
give presentations, that's definitely
00:12:14.286 --> 00:12:17.560
a technique that can be used, and I
like that you apply it to conversation.
00:12:17.983 --> 00:12:20.341
I wanna talk about how we did
prepare for this interview on
00:12:20.342 --> 00:12:21.856
that phone call on that Saturday.
00:12:22.087 --> 00:12:25.634
You and I had a conversation
about handling taboo topics,
00:12:25.643 --> 00:12:28.438
things like money, religion, sex.
00:12:28.760 --> 00:12:32.063
You have some really useful ideas
about how to discuss these types
00:12:32.063 --> 00:12:35.906
of topics, which turn out to be
really important as we develop
00:12:35.906 --> 00:12:37.574
deeper relationships with people.
00:12:37.803 --> 00:12:42.502
Can you share some tips and tools to help
us talk about topics that might be taboo?
00:12:42.984 --> 00:12:47.312
People tend to avoid taboo
topics because they're fearful of
00:12:47.337 --> 00:12:49.660
controversy or having awkward moments.
00:12:49.661 --> 00:12:54.318
But I would invite people, as they
move away from small talk and start
00:12:54.333 --> 00:13:00.749
to grow and deepen a relationship with
somebody, to reframe taboo topics as
00:13:00.749 --> 00:13:04.047
really a gateway to deepen connections.
00:13:04.389 --> 00:13:10.387
For example, what that looks like is
not focusing on the facts of the taboo
00:13:10.387 --> 00:13:15.341
topic, not, "What do you think about
it? Are you in favor of it or against
00:13:15.342 --> 00:13:19.871
it?" Those are facts about a taboo
topic like money, sex, or religion.
00:13:20.336 --> 00:13:25.223
But really to focus on the stories
and emotions behind those topics.
00:13:25.235 --> 00:13:31.583
So for example, if we use the taboo topic
of money, um, it's always somewhat awkward
00:13:31.617 --> 00:13:33.246
to talk about money for most people.
00:13:33.689 --> 00:13:38.986
So let's say you've been dating somebody
for a few weeks or months, and you
00:13:38.986 --> 00:13:43.833
wanna start assessing if your values
align on an important topic like money.
00:13:44.232 --> 00:13:49.558
So instead of asking a factual-based
question like, "Do you consider
00:13:49.558 --> 00:13:54.224
yourself frugal with your money, or
do you spend lavishly?" You might ask
00:13:54.259 --> 00:13:59.147
a question that evokes a story like,
"What did your parents teach you about
00:13:59.149 --> 00:14:04.473
money when you were growing up?" Or
you might ask a question like, "What's
00:14:04.473 --> 00:14:08.024
the first thing you bought with your
own money, and why was that important?"
00:14:08.493 --> 00:14:16.286
So here you're getting at the why of
what they feel and not a factual black
00:14:16.286 --> 00:14:21.247
or white answer in terms of whether they
align with what you think about the topic.
00:14:21.764 --> 00:14:27.058
So even though money is one of these
topics that people argue a lot about in
00:14:27.060 --> 00:14:33.096
marriages, what's important is how you
argue, not what you're arguing about, and
00:14:33.097 --> 00:14:38.644
not whether you're on the same page, but
how you resolve conflict when it arises.
00:14:38.964 --> 00:14:46.400
Taboo topics and using those to get
into storytelling about how someone's
00:14:46.401 --> 00:14:51.834
belief system was shaped, especially
at a young age, is really this kind
00:14:51.834 --> 00:14:57.945
of gateway to making taboo topics
a vehicle for deeper connection.
00:14:58.458 --> 00:15:01.060
So several things there that I
really like, that talking about
00:15:01.060 --> 00:15:04.007
topics that can be challenging
actually deepen the relationship.
00:15:04.374 --> 00:15:08.693
And a great way to do it is
through asking questions designed
00:15:08.694 --> 00:15:09.776
for people to explain why.
00:15:09.800 --> 00:15:10.507
Tell stories.
00:15:10.517 --> 00:15:14.051
Help me understand how you came to this
rather than what it is you believe.
00:15:14.440 --> 00:15:17.509
We had Wendy De La Rosa on, and we
talked a lot about money, and, and
00:15:17.510 --> 00:15:21.161
she had similar advice, that talking
about money in her case, but in all
00:15:21.163 --> 00:15:25.009
these topics, it's really an act of
demonstrating care and concern, and
00:15:25.011 --> 00:15:26.592
that's what deepens those relationships.
00:15:26.868 --> 00:15:31.851
And I love the idea of just soliciting
stories from people that allow you then
00:15:31.853 --> 00:15:33.894
to have, again, deeper conversations.
00:15:34.222 --> 00:15:35.182
Really good advice.
00:15:36.352 --> 00:15:37.774
Well, Rachel, you've been here before.
00:15:38.064 --> 00:15:41.952
You know that before we end, I
ask everybody three questions.
00:15:42.228 --> 00:15:46.238
One I make up just for you, and two
I've been asking people for a long time.
00:15:46.238 --> 00:15:49.232
And feel free to repeat what you've
said before or come up with different
00:15:49.232 --> 00:15:50.744
answers from our, your previous visit.
00:15:51.085 --> 00:15:51.930
Are you ready for these?
00:15:52.010 --> 00:15:52.814
Absolutely.
00:15:52.905 --> 00:15:53.714
Excellent.
00:15:54.258 --> 00:15:58.891
As a matchmaker, your clients go out on
dates every night all over the world,
00:15:59.214 --> 00:16:04.391
and the date outcome entirely hinges on
them having a good or bad conversation.
00:16:05.080 --> 00:16:08.674
How do you evaluate a successful
or unsuccessful date when you're
00:16:08.674 --> 00:16:12.229
not there yourself and you're just
listening in to what they tell you?
00:16:12.252 --> 00:16:14.935
How do you assess a good conversation?
00:16:15.493 --> 00:16:16.828
Oh, I love that question.
00:16:16.939 --> 00:16:23.131
The truth is, I have one simple
question that I reflect back to them,
00:16:23.329 --> 00:16:30.180
and I ask them, "What side of you
did they bring out?" So what I'm not
00:16:30.222 --> 00:16:33.915
asking is information-based questions.
00:16:33.974 --> 00:16:39.925
I am not asking, "Did you like
them?" Or, "What information did you
00:16:39.925 --> 00:16:44.257
learn about them?" Or, "Was there a
spark?" You know, those are typical
00:16:44.257 --> 00:16:47.746
questions that your friends might ask
you when you get back from a date.
00:16:48.127 --> 00:16:53.661
I'm asking, "What side of you did
they bring out?" to help me determine
00:16:53.690 --> 00:16:55.177
if this was a good or bad date.
00:16:55.704 --> 00:17:03.048
So if their answer is something like, "He
brought out my playful side," or maybe,
00:17:03.507 --> 00:17:08.472
"She brought out my confident side,"
then I know it was a successful date.
00:17:08.862 --> 00:17:13.271
But if their answer was something
more like, "Well, actually, he brought
00:17:13.271 --> 00:17:18.098
out my insecure side," or, "No, no,
she brought out my competitive side,"
00:17:18.620 --> 00:17:20.060
that's when I know it didn't go well.
00:17:20.702 --> 00:17:23.649
I really like that question
for assessing conversation, not
00:17:23.650 --> 00:17:25.023
just on dates, but in general.
00:17:25.023 --> 00:17:27.587
You know, what part of yourself
showed up or was able to be
00:17:27.589 --> 00:17:29.395
shown off in the conversation?
00:17:29.811 --> 00:17:32.354
And I think we can all do that ourselves.
00:17:32.355 --> 00:17:35.893
We don't need to just go to somebody who's
an expert like you and think about that.
00:17:36.284 --> 00:17:37.121
I really like that.
00:17:37.123 --> 00:17:38.590
I appreciate that question.
00:17:39.312 --> 00:17:43.423
Question number two, who's a
communicator that you admire, and why?
00:17:44.098 --> 00:17:48.735
I've thought about this since the
last time I was on the show, and
00:17:48.802 --> 00:17:53.454
I'm gonna tell you about a personal
friend of mine named Katrina.
00:17:53.521 --> 00:17:59.943
And the reason I admire her so much is
that she always makes me feel good when
00:17:59.943 --> 00:18:05.621
I talk to her, and she does two specific
things that always make me feel good.
00:18:06.036 --> 00:18:12.337
First of all, she has a signature
expression that she uses all the
00:18:12.337 --> 00:18:18.432
time, and the expression is, "It's not
lost on me." So she'll say something
00:18:18.432 --> 00:18:23.813
like, "It's not lost on me that you
have an early morning tomorrow and
00:18:23.823 --> 00:18:26.049
you didn't cancel our dinner tonight.
00:18:26.483 --> 00:18:30.225
I really appreciate that you came
out and spent this time with me."
00:18:30.485 --> 00:18:33.927
So she's just finding a way to
show appreciation, and it makes
00:18:33.928 --> 00:18:37.038
me feel so good, especially
when it's something so minor.
00:18:37.053 --> 00:18:41.947
You know, it's not lost on her
that I didn't cancel our date.
00:18:41.947 --> 00:18:46.793
Like, that's a pretty low bar, but
here she is feeling so appreciative.
00:18:47.125 --> 00:18:50.847
So I think that expression is something
that everybody should use more of.
00:18:51.318 --> 00:18:56.960
And then the second thing she does
is she leaves a lot of voice notes
00:18:56.986 --> 00:18:59.576
for me instead of texting me.
00:19:00.106 --> 00:19:07.616
And I think this is a really underutilized
feature on our phones because it's
00:19:07.655 --> 00:19:11.835
not only unique from everybody else
that's texting you, but it's more
00:19:12.009 --> 00:19:16.292
personal, and it creates an emotional
connection when I hear her voice.
00:19:16.656 --> 00:19:21.283
And so I would say 8 out of 10
times that I communicate with her
00:19:21.522 --> 00:19:23.684
is her leaving me a voice note.
00:19:23.941 --> 00:19:28.062
Now, I also appreciate that
it's not as intrusive as a phone
00:19:28.065 --> 00:19:31.808
call because that would be her
interrupting something else I'm doing.
00:19:31.818 --> 00:19:35.141
But, you know, the voice note is
just that beautiful, happy medium
00:19:35.157 --> 00:19:39.764
where I get personal and emotional
connection with her, but it's on
00:19:39.765 --> 00:19:41.533
my own time when I listen to it.
00:19:41.543 --> 00:19:46.219
So I think those two things, appreciation
and emotional connection, are really
00:19:46.254 --> 00:19:48.540
what make her a superstar communicator.
00:19:49.148 --> 00:19:52.396
I'll start by saying it's not lost on
me that you spent a little time thinking
00:19:52.397 --> 00:19:54.301
about this deeply, and I appreciate that.
00:19:54.331 --> 00:19:58.559
And taking the time to express
appreciation and finding a unique way
00:19:58.559 --> 00:20:01.246
to connect with somebody where your
true voice, in the case of a voice
00:20:01.248 --> 00:20:02.970
memo, comes out, I appreciate that.
00:20:03.588 --> 00:20:07.399
Well, the final question, Rachel, what
are the first three ingredients that go
00:20:07.399 --> 00:20:10.088
into a successful communication recipe?
00:20:10.855 --> 00:20:12.631
The first ingredient is mood.
00:20:12.881 --> 00:20:18.052
I think not enough people think
about how they make someone feel
00:20:18.322 --> 00:20:19.965
when they're talking to them.
00:20:19.996 --> 00:20:27.299
And so the idea here is that if somebody
says something to you like, "I love
00:20:27.323 --> 00:20:32.188
to ski," you might respond by saying
something like, "Me too," if you're the
00:20:32.188 --> 00:20:37.466
mirror, or you might respond by saying
something factual, a, a question like,
00:20:37.547 --> 00:20:42.103
"Where's your favorite place to ski?"
That would be a very legitimate response.
00:20:42.365 --> 00:20:48.971
But a mood-based response to somebody who
says they like to ski is more like saying
00:20:48.976 --> 00:20:54.079
to them, "Tell me the last time you went
skiing and you really loved the day."
00:20:54.572 --> 00:21:01.723
And that kind of evokes a time for them
when they felt good, and you're invoking
00:21:01.751 --> 00:21:09.702
a positive memory by asking a question
that is focused on them telling a story.
00:21:09.813 --> 00:21:16.532
It's promoting connection, and it's
not garnering information, but really
00:21:16.953 --> 00:21:22.067
creating a moment between the two of you
where they're affiliating the positive
00:21:22.082 --> 00:21:27.673
mood they are calling up from their
memory with almost, like, conflating
00:21:27.681 --> 00:21:31.274
it with you because you're the one
that's experiencing that with them.
00:21:31.801 --> 00:21:36.514
The second ingredient I would say
is a acronym I use all the time,
00:21:36.529 --> 00:21:40.106
which is DBB, don't be boring.
00:21:40.627 --> 00:21:46.993
I think not enough people use
DBB, don't be boring, as a lens
00:21:47.014 --> 00:21:49.585
to filter their conversation.
00:21:49.990 --> 00:21:56.139
And if you can start to remember
that every time you go to answer a
00:21:56.139 --> 00:22:01.444
question in a conversation, first
do a quick check, "Is this boring?"
00:22:01.665 --> 00:22:05.824
And if it is, come up with something
more interesting because boredom
00:22:05.840 --> 00:22:07.611
is just the enemy of conversation.
00:22:08.156 --> 00:22:12.964
And last, I guess the ingredient I
would say is probably vulnerability.
00:22:13.370 --> 00:22:17.650
Not just showing the polished
version of yourself, but really
00:22:17.653 --> 00:22:21.734
telling a story that's real and
humble, maybe self-deprecating.
00:22:21.962 --> 00:22:24.172
You could talk about a
challenge you're having.
00:22:24.181 --> 00:22:26.443
You could talk about
an embarrassing moment.
00:22:26.661 --> 00:22:28.105
You could talk about a regret.
00:22:28.489 --> 00:22:32.274
And it's not about bringing the mood
down or being negative, but really
00:22:32.274 --> 00:22:36.818
just being aware that the polished
version of you where everything's
00:22:36.821 --> 00:22:41.220
great and you're amazing is a
lost opportunity for connection.
00:22:41.918 --> 00:22:45.601
All of your three ingredients
have to do with connection.
00:22:46.060 --> 00:22:50.336
I really like the idea of setting the
mood through the things you ask and
00:22:50.345 --> 00:22:54.662
the interaction you have, and that
mood does transfer from if I'm having
00:22:54.662 --> 00:22:58.420
a good time telling you a story,
I'm having a good time with you.
00:22:58.738 --> 00:23:03.113
And this notion of as you begin
to respond in a conversation,
00:23:03.423 --> 00:23:04.939
you have choices of what to say.
00:23:04.946 --> 00:23:06.559
Choose the option that's less boring.
00:23:07.066 --> 00:23:10.796
And then finally, being vulnerable,
being authentic, really powerful.
00:23:11.230 --> 00:23:14.131
Rachel, like all of our conversations,
I learn so much from you.
00:23:14.172 --> 00:23:15.551
I really appreciate it.
00:23:15.632 --> 00:23:20.638
This notion of thinking first and
planning before we go into conversation,
00:23:20.988 --> 00:23:25.291
considering how we bridge into the
topics we want to have, and how we
00:23:25.293 --> 00:23:28.700
can bring out the best in others
and ourselves, really important.
00:23:28.700 --> 00:23:29.125
Thank you.
00:23:29.531 --> 00:23:30.421
Thanks for having me.
00:23:30.421 --> 00:23:31.821
It was a pleasure as always.
00:23:33.359 --> 00:23:35.502
Thank you for joining us
for another episode of Think
00:23:35.503 --> 00:23:37.179
Fast, Talk Smart, the podcast.
00:23:37.547 --> 00:23:41.203
To learn more from Rachel Greenwald,
please listen to episode 217.
00:23:41.713 --> 00:23:46.115
This episode was produced by Katherine
Reed, Ryan Campos, and me, Matt Abrahams.
00:23:46.370 --> 00:23:50.466
Our music is from Floyd Wonder, with
special thanks to Podium Podcast Company.
00:23:50.932 --> 00:23:53.962
Please find us on YouTube and
wherever you get your podcasts.
00:23:54.177 --> 00:23:56.272
Be sure to subscribe and rate us.
00:23:56.551 --> 00:23:59.171
Also, follow us on LinkedIn,
TikTok, and Instagram.
00:23:59.582 --> 00:24:03.441
And check out fastersmarter.io for
deep-dive videos, English language
00:24:03.442 --> 00:24:05.339
learning content, and our newsletter.
00:24:05.701 --> 00:24:08.685
Please consider joining our Think
Fast, Talk Smart Learning Community
00:24:08.686 --> 00:24:11.187
at fastersmarter.io/learning.
00:24:11.588 --> 00:24:15.094
You'll find video lessons, learning
quests, discussion boards, an AI
00:24:15.127 --> 00:24:17.175
coach, and book club opportunities.
00:24:17.424 --> 00:24:22.990
Again, that's fastersmarter.io/learning
to become part of our Learning Community.
Goodpods
RSS Feed